I got better at looking up flood maps when house hunting. Some folks say it's a must to avoid future headaches, others think it's not a big deal if the price is right. I'm stuck because skipping it could save time, but missing it might cost a lot later. Where do you stand on this?
Back in the day, I spent months looking for a house that checked every box. I gave up and started viewing places that needed updates. Ended up buying a little ranch that was a mess, but it was affordable and now it's mine. Funny how lowering your standards can actually work out.
I know most first time buyers want a big yard for kids or pets, but I really don't. I found a great condo in the city center with just a small balcony. It fits my budget and cuts down on maintenance, which I hate. My parents keep saying I'll regret not having outdoor space for barbecues or gardening. Honestly, I work long hours and would rather have a short commute than a lawn to mow. I've rented places with yards before and never used them much. The idea of less upkeep really appeals to me as a new homeowner. Am I making a mistake by ignoring the usual advice? Has anyone else chosen a place with minimal outdoor area and been happy with it?