Loading…
3
I used to think the new safety code updates were just more paperwork, but a call I got last week changed my mind.
Got a service call for a 15 year old traction elevator in a downtown office building. The governor rope had worn through its sheave lining, but the old style safety didn't trip because the rope just rode up on the metal. The new code that requires those rope gripper monitors would have caught it way earlier. Saw the before and after of the sheave groove - it was a smooth, deep channel worn over years, not a sudden break. What's one code change you initially disagreed with that you've come around on?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
oliviabarnes6mo ago
I read an article about those rope gripper monitors last year and thought it was just another cost add. But the writer described a case almost exactly like yours, where gradual wear created a perfect groove that completely hid the problem. The safety was still there, but it couldn't do its job anymore because the trigger was gone. It made me realize some failures are too quiet to hear until it's too late. That code change makes a lot more sense to me now.
4
jana_lewis166mo ago
That point about quiet failures from @oliviabarnes is so true. It got me thinking about how we trust old systems just because they've always been there. The real scary part isn't the sudden snap, it's the slow grind you never notice. Those code updates are like a second set of eyes on the stuff we get too used to seeing every day. Makes you wonder what else we're all just accepting as fine because it hasn't broken yet.
1