Loading…
22
Hot take on comparing audiobook vs. physical book for my club's latest pick
I read the first half of "The Underground Railroad" on audiobook during a 12-hour haul through Nebraska, then switched to a physical copy for the rest. The audiobook narrator's tone completely missed the urgency in key scenes, but the physical book let me slow down and catch details I would have glazed over otherwise. Has anyone else found that a narrator can make or break a book you'd otherwise like, or am I just too snobby about reading?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
the_angela3mo ago
charliew99's right, the Audiobook narrator for me wrecked a perfectly good thriller last month.
7
charliew993mo ago
I read an article in the Atlantic last year about how the brain processes audio and text differently, and it explained why I can't do audiobooks for nonfiction. The narrator for "The Underground Railroad" probably didn't have the same sense of the story's rhythm that you got from the physical book. For me, it's like the difference between hearing a song on the radio and reading the sheet music.
5